adding missing files #2662
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!2662
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/2662/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub pull request.
Original GitHub pull request: #2282
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2282
Original created: 2026-01-14T03:56:58Z
Original updated: 2026-01-14T03:58:17Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:updates/missing_files_linting
Original base: staging
Original merged: 2026-01-14T03:57:29Z by @mfreeman451
User description
IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin
Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:
Describe your changes
Issue ticket number and link
Code checklist before requesting a review
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
Format code for improved readability and consistency
Add blank line for better code organization
Adjust spacing in template text display
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
runtime.exs
Format DNS topology configuration codeweb-ng/config/runtime.exs
gateway_dns_queryassignment for improved codeorganization
maybe_add_dns_topologyfunction call to multi-line format forbetter readability
tenant_workload_controller.ex
Format error handling function callweb-ng/lib/serviceradar_web_ng_web/controllers/api/tenant_workload_controller.ex
readability
index.ex
Adjust spacing in network status displayweb-ng/lib/serviceradar_web_ng_web/live/settings/networks_live/index.ex
text
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2282#issuecomment-3747581620
Original created: 2026-01-14T03:57:29Z
PR Compliance Guide 🔍
Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
Sensitive error disclosure
Description: The API error response interpolates
inspect(reason)into the client-facing message, whichmay expose sensitive internal details (e.g., exception structs, configuration hints, or
upstream error data) to callers and should be sanitized or logged server-side instead.
tenant_workload_controller.ex [54-58]
Referred Code
🎫 No ticket provided
Codebase context is not defined
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails
Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.
Status: Passed
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting
Status: Passed
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation
Status: Passed
Generic: Secure Logging Practices
Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.
Status: Passed
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities
Status: Passed
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status:
Internal details exposed: The user-facing error message interpolates
inspect(reason), which can leak internalexception/details to the client.
Referred Code
Compliance status legend
🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2282#issuecomment-3747583052
Original created: 2026-01-14T03:58:17Z
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
Avoid leaking internal error details
Avoid leaking internal error details to the client. Instead, log the detailed
error server-side and return a generic error message.
web-ng/lib/serviceradar_web_ng_web/controllers/api/tenant_workload_controller.ex [54-58]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9
__
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a security vulnerability (information disclosure) by exposing raw error details via
inspect(reason)in an API response and proposes the standard best practice to fix it.