cleanup #2557
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!2557
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/2557/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub pull request.
Original GitHub pull request: #2118
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2118
Original created: 2025-12-13T22:36:55Z
Original updated: 2025-12-13T22:57:13Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:chore/cleanup_podman_docker_docs
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-12-13T22:57:09Z by @mfreeman451
User description
IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin
Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:
Describe your changes
Issue ticket number and link
Code checklist before requesting a review
PR Type
Documentation, Other
Description
Remove Podman-specific deployment scripts and documentation
Consolidate to Docker Compose as primary deployment method
Remove Podman dependencies from build Dockerfiles
Update references and documentation to reflect Docker-only focus
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
3 files
Removed entire Podman startup scriptRemoved entire Podman testing scriptRemoved entire Podman Compose configuration6 files
Removed Podman section and simplified prerequisitesRemoved Podman deployment documentation mentionUpdated comment to reflect Docker Compose onlyUpdated reference to remove Podman Compose fileUpdated task descriptions to remove Podman referencesUpdated task to reference mtls variants only2 files
Removed Podman and slirp4netns dependenciesRemoved Podman and container networking pluginsImported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2118#issuecomment-3649880142
Original created: 2025-12-13T22:37:22Z
You are nearing your monthly Qodo Merge usage quota. For more information, please visit here.
PR Compliance Guide 🔍
Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
No security concerns identified
No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.🎫 No ticket provided
Codebase context is not defined
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting
Status: Passed
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status: Passed
Generic: Secure Logging Practices
Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.
Status: Passed
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities
Status: Passed
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails
Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.
Status:
No audit context: The added documentation and config comments do not introduce or reference logging of
critical actions; however, this PR appears documentation/cleanup focused and may not
affect runtime audit trails.
Referred Code
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation
Status:
Missing error checks: Newly added Dockerfile directives (e.g., ENV PATH) and modified package lists do not show
error handling or validation for potential failures, but Dockerfile steps may be
acceptable as-is depending on build CI safeguards.
Referred Code
Compliance status legend
🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2118#issuecomment-3649880502
Original created: 2025-12-13T22:38:00Z
You are nearing your monthly Qodo Merge usage quota. For more information, please visit here.
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
Improve update instructions for clarity
Generalize the stack update instructions by replacing the hardcoded version
v1.0.77with a placeholder, and add guidance on finding the latest release andsetting the
APP_TAGenvironment variable.README-Docker.md [82-91]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5
__
Why: The suggestion correctly points out that hardcoding a version in documentation is not ideal and proposes a more robust, user-friendly approach that will not become outdated as quickly.