bump #2555

Merged

mfreeman451 merged 1 commit from refs/pull/2555/head into main

2025-12-13 03:37:08 +00:00

mfreeman451 commented

2025-12-13 03:36:56 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Owner

Imported from GitHub pull request.

Original GitHub pull request: #2116
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2116
Original created: 2025-12-13T03:36:56Z
Original updated: 2025-12-13T03:37:40Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:chore/bump_demo
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-12-13T03:37:08Z by @mfreeman451

User description

IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin

Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:

Signed-off-by: J. Doe <j.doe@domain.com>

Describe your changes

Issue ticket number and link

Code checklist before requesting a review

I have signed the DCO?
The build completes without errors?
All tests are passing when running make test?

PR Type

Other

Description

Bump ServiceRadar Helm chart version to 1.0.76
Update image tag to v1.0.76 in demo-prod environment

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["demo-prod.yaml"] -- "Update targetRevision" --> B["1.0.75 → 1.0.76"]
  A -- "Update imageTag" --> C["v1.0.75 → v1.0.76"]

File Walkthrough

Relevant files

Configuration changes

demo-prod.yaml

Bump ServiceRadar version to 1.0.76

k8s/argocd/applications/demo-prod.yaml

Updated Helm chart targetRevision from 1.0.75 to 1.0.76
Updated container image tag from v1.0.75 to v1.0.76
Changes apply to demo-prod ArgoCD application configuration

+2/-2

Imported from GitHub pull request. Original GitHub pull request: #2116 Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2116 Original created: 2025-12-13T03:36:56Z Original updated: 2025-12-13T03:37:40Z Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:chore/bump_demo Original base: main Original merged: 2025-12-13T03:37:08Z by @mfreeman451 --- ### **User description** ## IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include a [DCO sign-off statement]( https://developercertificate.org/) indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message: ``` Signed-off-by: J. Doe <j.doe@domain.com> ``` ## Describe your changes ## Issue ticket number and link ## Code checklist before requesting a review - [ ] I have signed the DCO? - [ ] The build completes without errors? - [ ] All tests are passing when running make test? ___ ### **PR Type** Other ___ ### **Description** - Bump ServiceRadar Helm chart version to 1.0.76 - Update image tag to v1.0.76 in demo-prod environment ___ ### Diagram Walkthrough ```mermaid flowchart LR A["demo-prod.yaml"] -- "Update targetRevision" --> B["1.0.75 → 1.0.76"] A -- "Update imageTag" --> C["v1.0.75 → v1.0.76"] ``` <details><summary><h3>File Walkthrough</h3></summary> <table><thead><tr><th></th><th align="left">Relevant files</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Configuration changes</td><td><table> <tr> <td> <details> <summary>demo-prod.yaml<dd><code>Bump ServiceRadar version to 1.0.76</code>                                            </dd></summary> <hr> k8s/argocd/applications/demo-prod.yaml <ul><li>Updated Helm chart <code>targetRevision</code> from 1.0.75 to 1.0.76 <li> Updated container image tag from v1.0.75 to v1.0.76 <li> Changes apply to demo-prod ArgoCD application configuration</ul> </details> </td> <td><a href="https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2116/files#diff-8969edef5dbf942365ae86b189a0b5225e613b2a99c431014a0073e6e7dc4108">+2/-2</a>      </td> </tr> </table></td></tr></tbody></table> </details> ___

qodo-code-review[bot] commented

2025-12-13 03:37:13 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub PR comment.

Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2116#issuecomment-3648867436
Original created: 2025-12-13T03:37:13Z

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢	No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
⚪	🎫 No ticket provided Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪	Codebase context is not defined Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢	Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Error Handling Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Logging Practices Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
⚪	Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance. Status: No audit context: The PR only bumps Helm chart and image tags, adding no application logic that could demonstrate audit trail coverage, so compliance cannot be verified from this diff. Referred Code `targetRevision: "1.0.76" helm: releaseName: serviceradar valueFiles: - values-demo.yaml parameters: - name: global.imageTag value: "v1.0.76"` Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation Status: No error paths: The change only updates configuration values (chart and image tags) and does not include error handling logic, so robustness cannot be assessed from this diff. Referred Code `targetRevision: "1.0.76" helm: releaseName: serviceradar valueFiles: - values-demo.yaml parameters: - name: global.imageTag value: "v1.0.76"` Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities Status: No input validation: The diff only updates Helm chart and image tags and does not expose input handling or security controls, so validation and data handling compliance cannot be determined. Referred Code `targetRevision: "1.0.76" helm: releaseName: serviceradar valueFiles: - values-demo.yaml parameters: - name: global.imageTag value: "v1.0.76"` Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend

🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

Imported GitHub PR comment. Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot] Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2116#issuecomment-3648867436 Original created: 2025-12-13T03:37:13Z --- ## PR Compliance Guide 🔍  Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR: <table><tbody><tr><td colspan='2'>Security Compliance</td></tr> <tr><td>🟢</td><td><details><summary>No security concerns identified</summary> No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code. </details></td></tr> <tr><td colspan='2'>Ticket Compliance</td></tr> <tr><td>⚪</td><td><details><summary>🎫 No ticket provided </summary> - [ ] Create ticket/issue  </details></td></tr> <tr><td colspan='2'>Codebase Duplication Compliance</td></tr> <tr><td>⚪</td><td><details><summary>Codebase context is not defined </summary> Follow the <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/rag_context_enrichment/'>guide</a> to enable codebase context checks. </details></td></tr> <tr><td colspan='2'>Custom Compliance</td></tr> <tr><td rowspan=3>🟢</td><td> <details><summary>Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code</summary> **Objective:** Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting **Status:** Passed > Learn more about managing compliance <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#configuration-options'>generic rules</a> or creating your own <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#custom-compliance'>custom rules</a> </details></td></tr> <tr><td> <details><summary>Generic: Secure Error Handling</summary> **Objective:** To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging. **Status:** Passed > Learn more about managing compliance <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#configuration-options'>generic rules</a> or creating your own <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#custom-compliance'>custom rules</a> </details></td></tr> <tr><td> <details><summary>Generic: Secure Logging Practices</summary> **Objective:** To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data. **Status:** Passed > Learn more about managing compliance <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#configuration-options'>generic rules</a> or creating your own <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#custom-compliance'>custom rules</a> </details></td></tr> <tr><td rowspan=3>⚪</td> <td><details> <summary>Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails</summary> **Objective:** To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance. **Status:** <a href='https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2116/files#diff-8969edef5dbf942365ae86b189a0b5225e613b2a99c431014a0073e6e7dc4108R14-R21'>No audit context</a>: The PR only bumps Helm chart and image tags, adding no application logic that could demonstrate audit trail coverage, so compliance cannot be verified from this diff. <details open><summary>Referred Code</summary> ```yaml targetRevision: "1.0.76" helm: releaseName: serviceradar valueFiles: - values-demo.yaml parameters: - name: global.imageTag value: "v1.0.76" ``` </details> > Learn more about managing compliance <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#configuration-options'>generic rules</a> or creating your own <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#custom-compliance'>custom rules</a> </details></td></tr> <tr><td><details> <summary>Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management</summary> **Objective:** Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation **Status:** <a href='https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2116/files#diff-8969edef5dbf942365ae86b189a0b5225e613b2a99c431014a0073e6e7dc4108R14-R21'>No error paths</a>: The change only updates configuration values (chart and image tags) and does not include error handling logic, so robustness cannot be assessed from this diff. <details open><summary>Referred Code</summary> ```yaml targetRevision: "1.0.76" helm: releaseName: serviceradar valueFiles: - values-demo.yaml parameters: - name: global.imageTag value: "v1.0.76" ``` </details> > Learn more about managing compliance <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#configuration-options'>generic rules</a> or creating your own <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#custom-compliance'>custom rules</a> </details></td></tr> <tr><td><details> <summary>Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling</summary> **Objective:** Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities **Status:** <a href='https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2116/files#diff-8969edef5dbf942365ae86b189a0b5225e613b2a99c431014a0073e6e7dc4108R14-R21'>No input validation</a>: The diff only updates Helm chart and image tags and does not expose input handling or security controls, so validation and data handling compliance cannot be determined. <details open><summary>Referred Code</summary> ```yaml targetRevision: "1.0.76" helm: releaseName: serviceradar valueFiles: - values-demo.yaml parameters: - name: global.imageTag value: "v1.0.76" ``` </details> > Learn more about managing compliance <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#configuration-options'>generic rules</a> or creating your own <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#custom-compliance'>custom rules</a> </details></td></tr> <tr><td align="center" colspan="2">   </td></tr></tbody></table> <details><summary>Compliance status legend</summary> 🟢 - Fully Compliant 🟡 - Partial Compliant 🔴 - Not Compliant ⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification 🏷️ - Compliance label </details>

qodo-code-review[bot] commented

2025-12-13 03:37:40 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub PR comment.

Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2116#issuecomment-3648867971
Original created: 2025-12-13T03:37:40Z

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

Imported GitHub PR comment. Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot] Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2116#issuecomment-3648867971 Original created: 2025-12-13T03:37:40Z --- ## PR Code Suggestions ✨ No code suggestions found for the PR.