Bump version to 1.0.58 #2480
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!2480
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/2480/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub pull request.
Original GitHub pull request: #2020
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2020
Original created: 2025-11-26T04:35:36Z
Original updated: 2025-11-26T04:55:14Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:release/1_0_58
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-11-26T04:55:10Z by @mfreeman451
User description
IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin
Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:
Describe your changes
Issue ticket number and link
Code checklist before requesting a review
PR Type
Other
Description
Update VERSION file from 1.0.57 to 1.0.58
Update all package versions in components.json to 1.0.58
Synchronize versions across 24 ServiceRadar components
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
VERSION
Version bump to 1.0.58VERSION
components.json
Synchronize all component versions to 1.0.58packaging/components.json
components
web, faker, agent, poller, mapper, nats, datasvc, sync, dusk-checker,
snmp-checker, zen, rperf, rperf-checker, flowgger, trapd, cli, otel,
profiler, and sysmon
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2020#issuecomment-3579045623
Original created: 2025-11-26T04:36:06Z
You are nearing your monthly Qodo Merge usage quota. For more information, please visit here.
PR Compliance Guide 🔍
Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
No security concerns identified
No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.🎫 No ticket provided
Codebase context is not defined
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails
Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.
Status:
No audit impact: The PR only bumps version strings and does not add or modify any runtime code paths where
audit logging would apply.
Referred Code
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting
Status:
No identifiers added: Changes are limited to version fields in JSON and a VERSION file; no new identifiers or
code constructs were introduced to evaluate naming.
Referred Code
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation
Status:
No error paths: The PR only updates version numbers without introducing executable logic where error
handling or edge case management would apply.
Referred Code
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status:
No user errors: No user-facing error messages were added or modified; only version fields changed, so
secure error handling cannot be evaluated here.
Referred Code
Generic: Secure Logging Practices
Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.
Status:
No logging changes: The diff contains only version bumps and does not add or modify logging statements, so
secure logging compliance is not impacted by this PR.
Referred Code
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities
Status:
No input handling: No input validation or data handling logic was added or changed; only package version
numbers were updated.
Referred Code
Compliance status legend
🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2020#issuecomment-3579048714
Original created: 2025-11-26T04:36:59Z
You are nearing your monthly Qodo Merge usage quota. For more information, please visit here.
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
Automate the version bumping process
To prevent version inconsistencies and reduce manual work, create a release
script. This script should automatically update the version number in all
relevant files from a single source of truth.
Examples:
packaging/components.json [34]
VERSION [1]
Solution Walkthrough:
Before:
After:
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
__
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a critical process flaw (manual versioning leading to inconsistency), which is directly evidenced by the changes in the PR, and proposes a robust automation solution.