2010 bug glibc not found #2476
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!2476
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/2476/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub pull request.
Original GitHub pull request: #2013
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2013
Original created: 2025-11-24T20:53:44Z
Original updated: 2025-11-24T20:55:25Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:2010-bug-glibc-not-found
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-11-24T20:55:21Z by @mfreeman451
User description
IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin
Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:
Describe your changes
Issue ticket number and link
Code checklist before requesting a review
PR Type
Bug fix, Enhancement
Description
Fix glibc compatibility by pinning Rust base images to specific versions
Update Ubuntu base images from Jammy to Noble for improved compatibility
Add Helm values-staging.yaml for demo-staging environment configuration
Update Helm ingress configuration with TLS and className support
Improve Helm documentation with clearer installation instructions
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
7 files
Pin Rust base image to specific versionPin Rust base image to specific versionPin Rust base image to bookworm versionPin Rust base image to specific versionPin Rust base image to specific versionPin Rust base image to specific versionUpdate base images to Ubuntu Noble1 files
Update installation instructions and add staging guide1 files
Add TLS cluster issuer and className support2 files
Add staging environment configuration overridesUpdate ingress defaults and add TLS configurationImported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2013#issuecomment-3572687284
Original created: 2025-11-24T20:54:18Z
PR Compliance Guide 🔍
Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
No security concerns identified
No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.🎫 #2010
components.
environments.
Kubernetes namespace after Helm rollout.
Codebase context is not defined
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting
Status: Passed
Generic: Secure Logging Practices
Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.
Status: Passed
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails
Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.
Status:
No audit logs: The added Helm ingress configuration and image/base changes do not introduce or reference
logging of critical actions, which may be handled elsewhere but is not evident in this
diff.
Referred Code
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation
Status:
Missing error paths: The Dockerfiles and Helm values add entrypoints and configuration but do not show handling
for failures at runtime; this may be managed by the application, which is not visible in
this diff.
Referred Code
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status:
User error detail: The added documentation and configuration do not demonstrate user-facing error messaging
behavior; this may be controlled by application code not present in the diff.
Referred Code
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities
Status:
Ingress security: While TLS and className settings were added, the diff does not show validation or security
controls for external inputs which may exist in the application layer not shown here.
Referred Code
Compliance status legend
🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2013#issuecomment-3572691664
Original created: 2025-11-24T20:55:16Z
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
Align build environment with runtime
To improve consistency and reduce potential library mismatches, change the build
image for
rperf-clientfromrust:1.78-bullseyetorust:1.78-bookwormin itsDockerfile.
docker/images/BUILD.bazel [805-813]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
__
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential build/runtime environment mismatch and proposes a valid change to improve consistency and prevent future library issues, which is a good practice for maintainability.
Support namespaced cert-manager issuers
Enhance the Ingress template to support namespaced cert-manager
Issuerresourcesin addition to the existing
ClusterIssuer, making the Helm chart more flexible.helm/serviceradar/templates/ingress.yaml [8-10]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
__
Why: This is a good suggestion for enhancing the Helm chart's flexibility by supporting namespace-scoped
Issuerresources, which improves usability for different cluster setups.