bump #2430
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!2430
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/2430/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub pull request.
Original GitHub pull request: #1962
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1962
Original created: 2025-11-20T03:49:51Z
Original updated: 2025-11-20T03:59:21Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:chore/bump_deps
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-11-20T03:58:05Z by @mfreeman451
User description
IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin
Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:
Describe your changes
Issue ticket number and link
Code checklist before requesting a review
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
Update multiple Go dependencies to latest versions
Bump pgx/v5 from v5.6.0 to v5.7.6 with related dependency updates
Update golang.org packages (crypto, net, sync, sys, tools, text, mod, oauth2)
Update google.golang.org packages (grpc, genproto) and OpenTelemetry proto
Update go-openapi packages and add new testify dependencies
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
go.mod
Update 20+ Go module dependenciesgo.mod
github.com/jackc/pgx/v5from v5.6.0 to v5.7.6golang.org/x/cryptofrom v0.43.0 to v0.45.0golang.org/x/netfrom v0.46.0 to v0.47.0golang.org/x/syncfrom v0.17.0 to v0.18.0golang.org/x/sysfrom v0.37.0 to v0.38.0golang.org/x/modfrom v0.29.0 to v0.30.0golang.org/x/oauth2from v0.32.0 to v0.33.0golang.org/x/textfrom v0.30.0 to v0.31.0golang.org/x/toolsfrom v0.38.0 to v0.39.0google.golang.org/grpcfrom v1.76.0 to v1.77.0google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiandrpctov0.0.0-20251111163417-95abcf5c77ba
go.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlpfrom v1.8.0 to v1.9.0go-openapipackages from v0.25.1 to v0.25.3github.com/jackc/pgservicefileandpuddle/v2indirectdependencies
go.sum
Update dependency checksums for all bumped packagesgo.sum
github.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.7.6github.com/jackc/pgservicefileandpuddle/v2golang.org/x/*packagesgoogle.golang.org/*packagesgo-openapipackagesgithub.com/go-openapi/testify/enable/yaml/v2and
testify/v2go.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlpImported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1962#issuecomment-3555647015
Original created: 2025-11-20T03:50:20Z
PR Compliance Guide 🔍
(Compliance updated until commit
github.com/carverauto/serviceradar@8e0b1f7054)Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
No security concerns identified
No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.🎫 No ticket provided
Codebase context is not defined
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails
Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.
Status:
No runtime code: This PR only updates dependencies in go.mod/go.sum and adds no new runtime code that could
add or remove audit logging, so we cannot verify audit trail coverage from the diff alone.
Referred Code
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting
Status:
No identifiers: The diff contains only dependency version changes without any new identifiers or code, so
naming conventions cannot be assessed from this PR diff.
Referred Code
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation
Status:
No error logic: There is no new application code in the diff (only dependency bumps), so error handling
and edge-case management cannot be evaluated here.
Referred Code
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status:
No user errors: The PR adds no user-facing error paths; with only dependency updates we cannot assess
secure error messaging from the diff.
Referred Code
Generic: Secure Logging Practices
Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.
Status:
No logging code: No new logging statements were introduced; dependency-only changes prevent assessing
logging structure or exposure risks from this diff.
Referred Code
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities
Status:
Dependency bumps: The PR solely updates dependencies (e.g., github.com/jackc/pgx/v5 and golang.org/x/*)
without new input-handling code, so validation and data-handling security cannot be
verified from the diff.
Referred Code
Compliance status legend
🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label
Previous compliance checks
Compliance check up to commit 8e0b1f7
No security concerns identified
No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.🎫 No ticket provided
Codebase context is not defined
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails
Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.
Status:
No runtime code: This PR only updates dependencies in go.mod/go.sum and adds no application code lines to
assess whether critical actions are logged.
Referred Code
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting
Status:
No identifiers: Only dependency version lines were changed, with no new identifiers or function names to
evaluate for meaningful naming.
Referred Code
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation
Status:
No error paths: The diff contains only dependency bumps (go.mod/go.sum) and no new code paths or error
handling to assess.
Referred Code
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status:
No user errors: There are no user-facing error messages added in this PR since it only updates
dependencies.
Referred Code
Generic: Secure Logging Practices
Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.
Status:
No logging code: No new logging statements were introduced; only dependency versions changed, so logging
practices cannot be assessed here.
Referred Code
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities
Status:
No input handling: With only go.mod/go.sum updates, there is no new input validation or data handling code to
evaluate for security posture.
Referred Code
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1962#issuecomment-3555648380
Original created: 2025-11-20T03:51:16Z
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
Review breaking change in dependency
The
pgx/v5update to v5.7.6 changes the default timestamp format forCopyFromtobinary. Review all usages to prevent potential data corruption and explicitly
configure text format if needed.
go.mod [17]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
__
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a significant breaking change in
pgx/v5v5.7.0 regarding timestamp handling inCopyFrom, which could lead to silent data corruption. Since the PR updates past this version, the warning is critical, although it only prompts for verification.Address potential gRPC connection leaks
The
grpcupdate to v1.77.0 disables channel idleness by default. Assess if yourapplication relies on the old behavior to prevent potential resource exhaustion
from idle connections.
go.mod [45]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
__
Why: The suggestion correctly points out that
grpcv1.77.0 disables channel idleness by default, which can lead to connection leaks. This is a critical behavior change relevant to the PR, though the suggestion is to assess the impact rather than providing a direct fix.