fixing md #2336

Merged
mfreeman451 merged 1 commit from refs/pull/2336/head into main 2025-10-19 01:18:58 +00:00
mfreeman451 commented 2025-10-19 01:18:49 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Owner

Imported from GitHub pull request.

Original GitHub pull request: #1798
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1798
Original created: 2025-10-19T01:18:49Z
Original updated: 2025-12-08T06:54:56Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:update/docusaurus_fix
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-10-19T01:18:58Z by @mfreeman451

PR Type

Documentation


Description

  • Clarified alert threshold phrasing in rollout checklist

  • Improved readability of latency metric specification


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Original phrasing:<br/>below the alert threshold<br/>(&lt;250 ms p95)"] -- "Reword for clarity" --> B["Updated phrasing:<br/>keep lookup latency<br/>below alert threshold<br/>(p95 under 250 ms)"]

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Documentation
architecture.md
Improve latency threshold documentation clarity                   

docs/docs/architecture.md

  • Rephrased latency threshold description in rollout checklist step 2
  • Changed from "below the alert threshold (<250 ms p95)" to "keep lookup
    latency below the alert threshold (p95 under 250 ms)"
  • Improved clarity and consistency of metric specification language
+1/-1     

Imported from GitHub pull request. Original GitHub pull request: #1798 Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1798 Original created: 2025-10-19T01:18:49Z Original updated: 2025-12-08T06:54:56Z Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:update/docusaurus_fix Original base: main Original merged: 2025-10-19T01:18:58Z by @mfreeman451 --- ### **PR Type** Documentation ___ ### **Description** - Clarified alert threshold phrasing in rollout checklist - Improved readability of latency metric specification ___ ### Diagram Walkthrough ```mermaid flowchart LR A["Original phrasing:<br/>below the alert threshold<br/>(&lt;250 ms p95)"] -- "Reword for clarity" --> B["Updated phrasing:<br/>keep lookup latency<br/>below alert threshold<br/>(p95 under 250 ms)"] ``` <details> <summary><h3> File Walkthrough</h3></summary> <table><thead><tr><th></th><th align="left">Relevant files</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Documentation</strong></td><td><table> <tr> <td> <details> <summary><strong>architecture.md</strong><dd><code>Improve latency threshold documentation clarity</code>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </dd></summary> <hr> docs/docs/architecture.md <ul><li>Rephrased latency threshold description in rollout checklist step 2<br> <li> Changed from "below the alert threshold (<250 ms p95)" to "keep lookup <br>latency below the alert threshold (p95 under 250 ms)"<br> <li> Improved clarity and consistency of metric specification language</ul> </details> </td> <td><a href="https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1798/files#diff-90abd06467420fd89391fd1a4d75ceb1f6a9381de4d13a95fffe606abff38d37">+1/-1</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </td> </tr> </table></td></tr></tr></tbody></table> </details> ___
qodo-code-review[bot] commented 2025-10-19 01:19:03 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Author
Owner

Imported GitHub PR comment.

Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1798#issuecomment-3419118974
Original created: 2025-10-19T01:19:03Z

You are nearing your monthly Qodo Merge usage quota. For more information, please visit here.

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
- [ ] Create ticket/issue <!-- /create_ticket --create_ticket=true -->

</details></td></tr>
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
No custom compliance provided

Follow the guide to enable custom compliance check.

Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
- Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label
Imported GitHub PR comment. Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot] Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1798#issuecomment-3419118974 Original created: 2025-10-19T01:19:03Z --- _You are nearing your monthly Qodo Merge usage quota. For more information, please visit [here](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/installation/qodo_merge/#cloud-users)._ ## PR Compliance Guide 🔍 <!-- https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/commit/ae852145e4ccb9008f7ca5541a73b2b9012b79e5 --> Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:<br> <table><tbody><tr><td colspan='2'><strong>Security Compliance</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>🟢</td><td><details><summary><strong>No security concerns identified</strong></summary> No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code. </details></td></tr> <tr><td colspan='2'><strong>Ticket Compliance</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>⚪</td><td><details><summary>🎫 <strong>No ticket provided </summary></strong> - [ ] Create ticket/issue <!-- /create_ticket --create_ticket=true --> </details></td></tr> <tr><td colspan='2'><strong>Codebase Duplication Compliance</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>⚪</td><td><details><summary><strong>Codebase context is not defined </strong></summary> Follow the <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/rag_context_enrichment/'>guide</a> to enable codebase context checks. </details></td></tr> <tr><td colspan='2'><strong>Custom Compliance</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>⚪</td><td><details><summary><strong>No custom compliance provided</strong></summary> Follow the <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/'>guide</a> to enable custom compliance check. </details></td></tr> <tr><td align="center" colspan="2"> <!-- placeholder --> <!-- /compliance --update_compliance=true --> </td></tr></tbody></table> <details><summary>Compliance status legend</summary> 🟢 - Fully Compliant<br> 🟡 - Partial Compliant<br> 🔴 - Not Compliant<br> ⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification<br> 🏷️ - Compliance label<br> </details>
qodo-code-review[bot] commented 2025-10-19 01:19:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Author
Owner

Imported GitHub PR comment.

Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1798#issuecomment-3419119034
Original created: 2025-10-19T01:19:11Z

You are nearing your monthly Qodo Merge usage quota. For more information, please visit here.

PR Code Suggestions

No code suggestions found for the PR.

Imported GitHub PR comment. Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot] Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1798#issuecomment-3419119034 Original created: 2025-10-19T01:19:11Z --- _You are nearing your monthly Qodo Merge usage quota. For more information, please visit [here](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/installation/qodo_merge/#cloud-users)._ ## PR Code Suggestions ✨ No code suggestions found for the PR.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!2336
No description provided.