carverauto/serviceradar

Fork 0

initial #2333

Merged

mfreeman451 merged 1 commit from refs/pull/2333/head into main

2025-10-17 04:15:28 +00:00

mfreeman451 commented

2025-10-17 03:55:34 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Owner

Imported from GitHub pull request.

Original GitHub pull request: #1795
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1795
Original created: 2025-10-17T03:55:34Z
Original updated: 2025-12-08T06:55:15Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:cncf/roadmap
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-10-17T04:15:28Z by @marvin-hansen

PR Type

Documentation

Description

Comprehensive ServiceRadar project roadmap for CNCF donation
Detailed current capabilities across platform, data collection, and security
Short-term goals (6-12 months) for production hardening and observability
Medium and long-term vision including enterprise features and cloud-native ecosystem
Community governance, success metrics, and contribution guidelines

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Current Capabilities v1.x"] --> B["Short-Term Goals<br/>6-12 Months"]
  B --> C["Medium-Term Goals<br/>12-24 Months"]
  C --> D["Long-Term Vision<br/>24+ Months"]
  E["Community & Governance"] -.-> B
  E -.-> C
  E -.-> D
  F["Technical Debt"] -.-> B
  F -.-> C

File Walkthrough

Relevant files

Documentation

ROADMAP.md

Complete ServiceRadar roadmap with vision and milestones

ROADMAP.md

Replaced minimal placeholder with comprehensive 230-line project
roadmap
Added overview and elevator pitch describing ServiceRadar as
distributed network monitoring platform
Documented current v1.x capabilities including multi-environment
support, stream processing, data collection, SRQL query language,
security features, and deployment options
Outlined short-term goals (Q1-Q3 2026) for production hardening, CNCF
onboarding, enhanced observability, and data platform evolution
Included medium-term goals (12-24 months) for platform modernization,
enterprise features, SIEM capabilities, and ecosystem integration
Defined long-term vision (24+ months) for next-generation
architecture, advanced analytics, cloud-native ecosystem, and
distributed storage
Added community governance section with contributor guidelines,
documentation, and ecosystem growth initiatives
Included technical debt items, success metrics, release cadence, and
contribution guidelines

+230/-1

Imported from GitHub pull request. Original GitHub pull request: #1795 Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1795 Original created: 2025-10-17T03:55:34Z Original updated: 2025-12-08T06:55:15Z Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:cncf/roadmap Original base: main Original merged: 2025-10-17T04:15:28Z by @marvin-hansen --- ### **PR Type** Documentation ___ ### **Description** - Comprehensive ServiceRadar project roadmap for CNCF donation - Detailed current capabilities across platform, data collection, and security - Short-term goals (6-12 months) for production hardening and observability - Medium and long-term vision including enterprise features and cloud-native ecosystem - Community governance, success metrics, and contribution guidelines ___ ### Diagram Walkthrough ```mermaid flowchart LR A["Current Capabilities v1.x"] --> B["Short-Term Goals<br/>6-12 Months"] B --> C["Medium-Term Goals<br/>12-24 Months"] C --> D["Long-Term Vision<br/>24+ Months"] E["Community & Governance"] -.-> B E -.-> C E -.-> D F["Technical Debt"] -.-> B F -.-> C ``` <details> <summary><h3> File Walkthrough</h3></summary> <table><thead><tr><th></th><th align="left">Relevant files</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Documentation</strong></td><td><table> <tr> <td> <details> <summary><strong>ROADMAP.md</strong><dd><code>Complete ServiceRadar roadmap with vision and milestones</code>  </dd></summary> <hr> ROADMAP.md <ul><li>Replaced minimal placeholder with comprehensive 230-line project <br>roadmap<br> <li> Added overview and elevator pitch describing ServiceRadar as <br>distributed network monitoring platform<br> <li> Documented current v1.x capabilities including multi-environment <br>support, stream processing, data collection, SRQL query language, <br>security features, and deployment options<br> <li> Outlined short-term goals (Q1-Q3 2026) for production hardening, CNCF <br>onboarding, enhanced observability, and data platform evolution<br> <li> Included medium-term goals (12-24 months) for platform modernization, <br>enterprise features, SIEM capabilities, and ecosystem integration<br> <li> Defined long-term vision (24+ months) for next-generation <br>architecture, advanced analytics, cloud-native ecosystem, and <br>distributed storage<br> <li> Added community governance section with contributor guidelines, <br>documentation, and ecosystem growth initiatives<br> <li> Included technical debt items, success metrics, release cadence, and <br>contribution guidelines</ul> </details> </td> <td><a href="https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1795/files#diff-683343bdf93f55ed3cada86151abb8051282e1936e58d4e0a04beca95dff6e51">+230/-1</a>  </td> </tr> </table></td></tr></tr></tbody></table> </details> ___

qodo-code-review[bot] commented

2025-10-17 03:55:51 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub PR comment.

Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1795#issuecomment-3413743210
Original created: 2025-10-17T03:55:51Z

You are nearing your monthly Qodo Merge usage quota. For more information, please visit here.

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢	No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
⚪	🎫 No ticket provided `- [ ] Create ticket/issue <!-- /create_ticket --create_ticket=true --> </details></td></tr>`
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪	Codebase context is not defined Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
⚪	No custom compliance provided Follow the guide to enable custom compliance check.

Compliance status legend

🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

Imported GitHub PR comment. Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot] Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1795#issuecomment-3413743210 Original created: 2025-10-17T03:55:51Z --- _You are nearing your monthly Qodo Merge usage quota. For more information, please visit [here](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/installation/qodo_merge/#cloud-users)._ ## PR Compliance Guide 🔍  Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:<br> <table><tbody><tr><td colspan='2'><strong>Security Compliance</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>🟢</td><td><details><summary><strong>No security concerns identified</strong></summary> No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code. </details></td></tr> <tr><td colspan='2'><strong>Ticket Compliance</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>⚪</td><td><details><summary>🎫 <strong>No ticket provided </summary></strong> - [ ] Create ticket/issue  </details></td></tr> <tr><td colspan='2'><strong>Codebase Duplication Compliance</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>⚪</td><td><details><summary><strong>Codebase context is not defined </strong></summary> Follow the <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/rag_context_enrichment/'>guide</a> to enable codebase context checks. </details></td></tr> <tr><td colspan='2'><strong>Custom Compliance</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>⚪</td><td><details><summary><strong>No custom compliance provided</strong></summary> Follow the <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/'>guide</a> to enable custom compliance check. </details></td></tr> <tr><td align="center" colspan="2">   </td></tr></tbody></table> <details><summary>Compliance status legend</summary> 🟢 - Fully Compliant<br> 🟡 - Partial Compliant<br> 🔴 - Not Compliant<br> ⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification<br> 🏷️ - Compliance label<br> </details>

qodo-code-review[bot] commented

2025-10-17 03:57:04 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub PR comment.

Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1795#issuecomment-3413746461
Original created: 2025-10-17T03:57:04Z

You are nearing your monthly Qodo Merge usage quota. For more information, please visit here.

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category Suggestion Impact

High-level

Category	Suggestion	Impact
High-level	Roadmap scope seems overly ambitious The roadmap is overly ambitious, listing too many major features in a short timeline. It should be revised to prioritize a smaller, more focused set of core features for the short-term to manage expectations and build credibility. Examples: ROADMAP.md [54-106] ## Short-Term Goals (6-12 Months) ### Q1 2026: Production Hardening & CNCF Onboarding - [ ] Helm Chart: Official Kubernetes deployment via Helm - [ ] Documentation: Comprehensive deployment, operations, and troubleshooting guides - [ ] Security Audit: Third-party security assessment and remediation - [ ] Performance Benchmarks: Published performance characteristics and tuning guides - [ ] CNCF Sandbox Application: Submit project for CNCF Sandbox status ### Q2 2026: Enhanced Observability ... (clipped 43 lines) Solution Walkthrough: Before: `## Short-Term Goals (6-12 Months) - [ ] Helm Chart - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Security Audit - [ ] OCSF Alignment - [ ] Enhanced eBPF/Profiler - [ ] Win32 Agents - [ ] NetFlow Support - [ ] BGP BMP Integration - ... (and 6 more major items) ## Medium-Term Goals (12-24 Months) - [ ] SSO Integration - [ ] SAML Integration - [ ] Advanced RBAC - [ ] Multi-Tenancy - [ ] SIEM Capabilities - ... (and 11 more major items)` After: ## Short-Term Goals (6-12 Months) ### Theme: Production Readiness & Core Observability - [ ] Official Helm Chart for Kubernetes deployment - [ ] Third-party security audit and remediation - [ ] NetFlow/IPFIX data collection and analysis - [ ] Full OpenTelemetry protocol support - [ ] Comprehensive deployment and operations guides ## Medium-Term Goals (12-24 Months) ### Theme: Enterprise Features & Platform Modernization - [ ] SSO Integration (OAuth2/OIDC) - [ ] Granular Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) - [ ] Configuration management via Web UI - ... (a more focused and curated list) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 __ Why: The suggestion provides critical strategic feedback on the roadmap's content, correctly identifying that its ambitious scope may be unrealistic and damage project credibility, which is a significant issue for a foundational document like a roadmap.	Medium
More

Roadmap scope seems overly ambitious

The roadmap is overly ambitious, listing too many major features in a short
timeline. It should be revised to prioritize a smaller, more focused set of core
features for the short-term to manage expectations and build credibility.

Examples:

ROADMAP.md [54-106]

## Short-Term Goals (6-12 Months)

### Q1 2026: Production Hardening & CNCF Onboarding
- [ ] **Helm Chart**: Official Kubernetes deployment via Helm
- [ ] **Documentation**: Comprehensive deployment, operations, and troubleshooting guides
- [ ] **Security Audit**: Third-party security assessment and remediation
- [ ] **Performance Benchmarks**: Published performance characteristics and tuning guides
- [ ] **CNCF Sandbox Application**: Submit project for CNCF Sandbox status

### Q2 2026: Enhanced Observability

 ... (clipped 43 lines)

Solution Walkthrough:

Before:

## Short-Term Goals (6-12 Months)
- [ ] Helm Chart
- [ ] Documentation
- [ ] Security Audit
- [ ] OCSF Alignment
- [ ] Enhanced eBPF/Profiler
- [ ] Win32 Agents
- [ ] NetFlow Support
- [ ] BGP BMP Integration
- ... (and 6 more major items)

## Medium-Term Goals (12-24 Months)
- [ ] SSO Integration
- [ ] SAML Integration
- [ ] Advanced RBAC
- [ ] Multi-Tenancy
- [ ] SIEM Capabilities
- ... (and 11 more major items)

After:

## Short-Term Goals (6-12 Months)
### Theme: Production Readiness & Core Observability
- [ ] Official Helm Chart for Kubernetes deployment
- [ ] Third-party security audit and remediation
- [ ] NetFlow/IPFIX data collection and analysis
- [ ] Full OpenTelemetry protocol support
- [ ] Comprehensive deployment and operations guides

## Medium-Term Goals (12-24 Months)
### Theme: Enterprise Features & Platform Modernization
- [ ] SSO Integration (OAuth2/OIDC)
- [ ] Granular Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
- [ ] Configuration management via Web UI
- ... (a more focused and curated list)

Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: The suggestion provides critical strategic feedback on the roadmap's content, correctly identifying that its ambitious scope may be unrealistic and damage project credibility, which is a significant issue for a foundational document like a roadmap.

Medium

Imported GitHub PR comment. Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot] Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1795#issuecomment-3413746461 Original created: 2025-10-17T03:57:04Z --- _You are nearing your monthly Qodo Merge usage quota. For more information, please visit [here](https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/installation/qodo_merge/#cloud-users)._ ## PR Code Suggestions ✨  Explore these optional code suggestions: <table><thead><tr><td><strong>Category</strong></td><td align=left><strong>Suggestion                                                                                                                                    </strong></td><td align=center><strong>Impact</strong></td></tr><tbody><tr><td rowspan=1>High-level</td> <td> <details><summary>Roadmap scope seems overly ambitious</summary> ___ **The roadmap is overly ambitious, listing too many major features in a short <br>timeline. It should be revised to prioritize a smaller, more focused set of core <br>features for the short-term to manage expectations and build credibility.** ### Examples: <details> <summary> <a href="https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1795/files#diff-683343bdf93f55ed3cada86151abb8051282e1936e58d4e0a04beca95dff6e51R54-R106">ROADMAP.md [54-106]</a> </summary> ```markdown ## Short-Term Goals (6-12 Months) ### Q1 2026: Production Hardening & CNCF Onboarding - [ ] **Helm Chart**: Official Kubernetes deployment via Helm - [ ] **Documentation**: Comprehensive deployment, operations, and troubleshooting guides - [ ] **Security Audit**: Third-party security assessment and remediation - [ ] **Performance Benchmarks**: Published performance characteristics and tuning guides - [ ] **CNCF Sandbox Application**: Submit project for CNCF Sandbox status ### Q2 2026: Enhanced Observability ... (clipped 43 lines) ``` </details> ### Solution Walkthrough: #### Before: ```markdown ## Short-Term Goals (6-12 Months) - [ ] Helm Chart - [ ] Documentation - [ ] Security Audit - [ ] OCSF Alignment - [ ] Enhanced eBPF/Profiler - [ ] Win32 Agents - [ ] NetFlow Support - [ ] BGP BMP Integration - ... (and 6 more major items) ## Medium-Term Goals (12-24 Months) - [ ] SSO Integration - [ ] SAML Integration - [ ] Advanced RBAC - [ ] Multi-Tenancy - [ ] SIEM Capabilities - ... (and 11 more major items) ``` #### After: ```markdown ## Short-Term Goals (6-12 Months) ### Theme: Production Readiness & Core Observability - [ ] Official Helm Chart for Kubernetes deployment - [ ] Third-party security audit and remediation - [ ] NetFlow/IPFIX data collection and analysis - [ ] Full OpenTelemetry protocol support - [ ] Comprehensive deployment and operations guides ## Medium-Term Goals (12-24 Months) ### Theme: Enterprise Features & Platform Modernization - [ ] SSO Integration (OAuth2/OIDC) - [ ] Granular Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) - [ ] Configuration management via Web UI - ... (a more focused and curated list) ``` <details><summary>Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8</summary> __ Why: The suggestion provides critical strategic feedback on the roadmap's content, correctly identifying that its ambitious scope may be unrealistic and damage project credibility, which is a significant issue for a foundational document like a roadmap. </details></details></td><td align=center>Medium </td></tr> <tr><td align="center" colspan="2"> - [ ] More  </td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

marvin-hansen commented

2025-10-17 04:15:24 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub PR comment.

Original author: @marvin-hansen
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1795#issuecomment-3413798589
Original created: 2025-10-17T04:15:24Z

LGTM

Imported GitHub PR comment. Original author: @marvin-hansen Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1795#issuecomment-3413798589 Original created: 2025-10-17T04:15:24Z --- LGTM