fixing header #2270
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!2270
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/2270/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub pull request.
Original GitHub pull request: #1696
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1696
Original created: 2025-10-04T07:16:06Z
Original updated: 2025-10-04T07:49:04Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:cicd/cant_publish
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-10-04T07:18:40Z by @mfreeman451
PR Type
Bug fix
Description
Fix HTTP request content length handling in GitHub asset upload
Replace manual header setting with proper ContentLength field
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
publish_packages.go
Fix HTTP content length handlingrelease/publish_packages.go
req.ContentLengthfield directly instead of manual headerImported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1696#issuecomment-3367984843
Original created: 2025-10-04T07:16:21Z
PR Compliance Guide 🔍
Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
No security concerns identified
No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.🎫 No ticket provided
Codebase context is not defined
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
No custom compliance provided
Follow the guide to enable custom compliance check.
Compliance status legend
🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1696#issuecomment-3367985444
Original created: 2025-10-04T07:17:12Z
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
Ensure file is read from beginning
Add a call to
file.Seek(0, io.SeekStart)before creating the HTTP request toensure the file is always read from the beginning.
release/publish_packages.go [439-443]
[To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually]Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
__
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential robustness issue and proposes adding a file seek to prevent future bugs, even though the issue is not present in the current code.