feat: enhanced process details #909
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar#909
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub.
Original GitHub issue: #2604
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2604
Original created: 2026-01-30T06:47:29Z
Is your feature request related to a problem?
When we display the list of processes that we collect from serviceradar-agent when sysmon/host health check monitoring is enabled, we should show checkboxes next to each process and allow the user to click the process to see a process details page. I'm not even sure what we can do here of if this is even possible with the current library we're using on the agent, if we can expose more information that we're already collecting, or if we've already exposed all of it and what you see is what you get.
What I think would also be nice is to be able to select a process and start creating a chart or sparkline (user sohuld be able to choose) similiar to what we're already doing for SNMP metrics, the sparkline stuff might be a little different but we have a good reference with the ICMPSparkline stuff to go off of. If a user creates a sparkline for a sysmon metric, it should also render in the device inventory UI the same way the ICMP sparklines are intended to be. Not sure how we handle if a user wants to create more than one sparkline, as to which one would be shown, I don't think we want to jam up the device inventory UI view too much more.
We should also show sparklines for all of these processes in this table since we have the data (need to make sure we are putting the collected process data in hypertables)
Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.