feat: sysmon should report available disks/mounts #737
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar#737
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub.
Original GitHub issue: #2286
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2286
Original created: 2026-01-14T07:47:33Z
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Since sysmon is now baked into serviceradar-agent, it would be make configuring the sysmon profiles in the admin/settings UI easier if we knew ahead of time what available mount points we have, based on actual mount points on each system that has an agent installed and sysmon enabled.
Lets update sysmon to report more information back up to the agent-gateway/core about the host system so we can present some more options/hints to the user about what filesystems they might want to setup monitoring for. We should make this robust enough so that if a user had 100k agents and some hosts had hundreds of mount points or something like that, we get rid of outliers like that and don't make this huge list or array of labels/suggestions that blow up our UI, we basically just need to find the most common 5 partitions and probably also filter out the ones that users will most likely never need to monitor on a linux (rhel, debian) or osx system.
Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.