bump #2540

Merged

mfreeman451 merged 1 commit from refs/pull/2540/head into main

2025-12-10 21:41:07 +00:00

mfreeman451 commented

2025-12-10 21:40:40 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Owner

Imported from GitHub pull request.

Original GitHub pull request: #2099
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2099
Original created: 2025-12-10T21:40:40Z
Original updated: 2025-12-10T21:44:41Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:chore/update_helm_1_0_67
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-12-10T21:41:07Z by @mfreeman451

User description

IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin

Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:

Signed-off-by: J. Doe <j.doe@domain.com>

Describe your changes

Issue ticket number and link

Code checklist before requesting a review

I have signed the DCO?
The build completes without errors?
All tests are passing when running make test?

PR Type

Enhancement

Description

Update ServiceRadar Helm chart image tag from v1.0.65 to v1.0.67
Bumps core and web service versions to latest release

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Helm values.yaml"] -- "Update appTag" --> B["v1.0.65 → v1.0.67"]
  B -- "Applies to" --> C["core service"]
  B -- "Applies to" --> D["web service"]

File Walkthrough

Relevant files

Configuration changes

values.yaml

Bump Helm chart image tags to v1.0.67

helm/serviceradar/values.yaml

Updated appTag anchor value from v1.0.65 to v1.0.67
Core and web services now reference the updated tag version
NATS service version remains unchanged at 2.12.2-alpine

+1/-1

Imported from GitHub pull request. Original GitHub pull request: #2099 Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2099 Original created: 2025-12-10T21:40:40Z Original updated: 2025-12-10T21:44:41Z Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:chore/update_helm_1_0_67 Original base: main Original merged: 2025-12-10T21:41:07Z by @mfreeman451 --- ### **User description** ## IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include a [DCO sign-off statement]( https://developercertificate.org/) indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message: ``` Signed-off-by: J. Doe <j.doe@domain.com> ``` ## Describe your changes ## Issue ticket number and link ## Code checklist before requesting a review - [ ] I have signed the DCO? - [ ] The build completes without errors? - [ ] All tests are passing when running make test? ___ ### **PR Type** Enhancement ___ ### **Description** - Update ServiceRadar Helm chart image tag from v1.0.65 to v1.0.67 - Bumps core and web service versions to latest release ___ ### Diagram Walkthrough ```mermaid flowchart LR A["Helm values.yaml"] -- "Update appTag" --> B["v1.0.65 → v1.0.67"] B -- "Applies to" --> C["core service"] B -- "Applies to" --> D["web service"] ``` <details><summary><h3>File Walkthrough</h3></summary> <table><thead><tr><th></th><th align="left">Relevant files</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Configuration changes</td><td><table> <tr> <td> <details> <summary>values.yaml<dd><code>Bump Helm chart image tags to v1.0.67</code>                                        </dd></summary> <hr> helm/serviceradar/values.yaml <ul><li>Updated <code>appTag</code> anchor value from v1.0.65 to v1.0.67 <li> Core and web services now reference the updated tag version <li> NATS service version remains unchanged at 2.12.2-alpine</ul> </details> </td> <td><a href="https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2099/files#diff-d4449c7cb70362554b274f81eae5a4b81a8e81df494282e383d1b7ea3871c452">+1/-1</a>      </td> </tr> </table></td></tr></tbody></table> </details> ___

qodo-code-review[bot] commented

2025-12-10 21:40:59 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub PR comment.

Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2099#issuecomment-3639077697
Original created: 2025-12-10T21:40:59Z

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢	No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
⚪	🎫 No ticket provided Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪	Codebase context is not defined Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢	Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Error Handling Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Logging Practices Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
⚪	Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance. Status: No audit context: The PR only updates a Helm image tag and does not add or modify any application logic related to auditing, so compliance with audit trail requirements cannot be assessed from this change alone. Referred Code `appTag: &appTag "v1.0.67" # ServiceRadar UUID identity system - generates stable device IDs based on strong identifiers core: appTag web: appTag` Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation Status: No error logic: The change updates an image tag in Helm values and introduces no error handling paths, so robustness of error handling cannot be evaluated from the diff. Referred Code `appTag: &appTag "v1.0.67" # ServiceRadar UUID identity system - generates stable device IDs based on strong identifiers core: appTag web: appTag` Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities Status: No input handling: The PR only bumps a Helm image tag and does not introduce or modify any input validation or data handling, so security controls cannot be assessed from the diff. Referred Code `appTag: &appTag "v1.0.67" # ServiceRadar UUID identity system - generates stable device IDs based on strong identifiers core: appTag web: appTag` Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend

🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

Imported GitHub PR comment. Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot] Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2099#issuecomment-3639077697 Original created: 2025-12-10T21:40:59Z --- ## PR Compliance Guide 🔍  Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR: <table><tbody><tr><td colspan='2'>Security Compliance</td></tr> <tr><td>🟢</td><td><details><summary>No security concerns identified</summary> No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code. </details></td></tr> <tr><td colspan='2'>Ticket Compliance</td></tr> <tr><td>⚪</td><td><details><summary>🎫 No ticket provided </summary> - [ ] Create ticket/issue  </details></td></tr> <tr><td colspan='2'>Codebase Duplication Compliance</td></tr> <tr><td>⚪</td><td><details><summary>Codebase context is not defined </summary> Follow the <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/core-abilities/rag_context_enrichment/'>guide</a> to enable codebase context checks. </details></td></tr> <tr><td colspan='2'>Custom Compliance</td></tr> <tr><td rowspan=3>🟢</td><td> <details><summary>Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code</summary> **Objective:** Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting **Status:** Passed > Learn more about managing compliance <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#configuration-options'>generic rules</a> or creating your own <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#custom-compliance'>custom rules</a> </details></td></tr> <tr><td> <details><summary>Generic: Secure Error Handling</summary> **Objective:** To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging. **Status:** Passed > Learn more about managing compliance <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#configuration-options'>generic rules</a> or creating your own <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#custom-compliance'>custom rules</a> </details></td></tr> <tr><td> <details><summary>Generic: Secure Logging Practices</summary> **Objective:** To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data. **Status:** Passed > Learn more about managing compliance <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#configuration-options'>generic rules</a> or creating your own <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#custom-compliance'>custom rules</a> </details></td></tr> <tr><td rowspan=3>⚪</td> <td><details> <summary>Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails</summary> **Objective:** To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance. **Status:** <a href='https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2099/files#diff-d4449c7cb70362554b274f81eae5a4b81a8e81df494282e383d1b7ea3871c452R5-R8'>No audit context</a>: The PR only updates a Helm image tag and does not add or modify any application logic related to auditing, so compliance with audit trail requirements cannot be assessed from this change alone. <details open><summary>Referred Code</summary> ```yaml appTag: &appTag "v1.0.67" # ServiceRadar UUID identity system - generates stable device IDs based on strong identifiers core: *appTag web: *appTag ``` </details> > Learn more about managing compliance <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#configuration-options'>generic rules</a> or creating your own <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#custom-compliance'>custom rules</a> </details></td></tr> <tr><td><details> <summary>Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management</summary> **Objective:** Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation **Status:** <a href='https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2099/files#diff-d4449c7cb70362554b274f81eae5a4b81a8e81df494282e383d1b7ea3871c452R5-R8'>No error logic</a>: The change updates an image tag in Helm values and introduces no error handling paths, so robustness of error handling cannot be evaluated from the diff. <details open><summary>Referred Code</summary> ```yaml appTag: &appTag "v1.0.67" # ServiceRadar UUID identity system - generates stable device IDs based on strong identifiers core: *appTag web: *appTag ``` </details> > Learn more about managing compliance <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#configuration-options'>generic rules</a> or creating your own <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#custom-compliance'>custom rules</a> </details></td></tr> <tr><td><details> <summary>Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling</summary> **Objective:** Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities **Status:** <a href='https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2099/files#diff-d4449c7cb70362554b274f81eae5a4b81a8e81df494282e383d1b7ea3871c452R5-R8'>No input handling</a>: The PR only bumps a Helm image tag and does not introduce or modify any input validation or data handling, so security controls cannot be assessed from the diff. <details open><summary>Referred Code</summary> ```yaml appTag: &appTag "v1.0.67" # ServiceRadar UUID identity system - generates stable device IDs based on strong identifiers core: *appTag web: *appTag ``` </details> > Learn more about managing compliance <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#configuration-options'>generic rules</a> or creating your own <a href='https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/tools/compliance/#custom-compliance'>custom rules</a> </details></td></tr> <tr><td align="center" colspan="2">   </td></tr></tbody></table> <details><summary>Compliance status legend</summary> 🟢 - Fully Compliant 🟡 - Partial Compliant 🔴 - Not Compliant ⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification 🏷️ - Compliance label </details>

qodo-code-review[bot] commented

2025-12-10 21:41:12 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub PR comment.

Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2099#issuecomment-3639078337
Original created: 2025-12-10T21:41:12Z

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

Imported GitHub PR comment. Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot] Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2099#issuecomment-3639078337 Original created: 2025-12-10T21:41:12Z --- ## PR Code Suggestions ✨ No code suggestions found for the PR.