feat: netflow enhancements #960
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar#960
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub.
Original GitHub issue: #2681
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2681
Original created: 2026-02-03T05:21:23Z
This PRD outlines the evolution of the ServiceRadar NetFlow Observability module from a basic flow logger to a high-context network intelligence dashboard.
PRD: ServiceRadar NetFlow Observability Enhancements
Status: Draft / Discovery
Author: Product Engineering
Version: 1.0
1. Executive Summary
The goal is to transform the existing NetFlow parser UI from a raw data table into an actionable diagnostic tool. By adding Data Enrichment, Hierarchical Visualizations, and Security Intelligence, we will enable users to reduce Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) for network congestion and security incidents.
2. Target Audience
3. Feature Requirements
Phase 1: Data Enrichment (Contextualization)
Raw IPs are difficult to interpret. We must bridge the gap between "Network Address" and "Business Entity."
34.98.106.0→google-lb.com) within the table view.HTTPS, 53 →DNS, 22 →SSH).Amazon.com,Comcast,DigitalOcean).Inbound,Outbound, orInternal (East-West)based on defined local subnets.Phase 2: Advanced Visualizations (Pattern Recognition)
Users need to see the "big picture" before diving into the "raw logs."
Source Subnet→Protocol/Port→Destination.Phase 3: Interactive UX & Filtering
The dashboard must act as a cohesive workspace where visuals and data are linked.
/24or/16subnets to reduce table noise.KB,MB,GB, orTBbased on volume.4. Security & Intelligence (Value-Add)
Moving from "What happened?" to "Is this dangerous?"
5. Technical Considerations & Performance
6. Success Metrics
7. UI/UX Mockup Notes (Iteration on Current Design)