feat(sdk): create device records from plugins/integrations #922

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-28 04:29:55 +00:00 by mfreeman451 · 2 comments

mfreeman451 commented

2026-03-28 04:29:55 +00:00

Owner

Imported from GitHub.

Original GitHub issue: #2620
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2620
Original created: 2026-01-30T18:28:17Z

Is your feature request related to a problem?

We should devise a way that plugins/plugin authors, leveraging the Go or Rust serviceradar plugin SDKs, can easily create Device Records in ServiceRadar. This would allow us to move our integration layer (armis, netbox, etc) to be just another WASM plugin and would make it easier for the community or users to develop integrations on their own.

Describe the solution you'd like

A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered

A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Imported from GitHub. Original GitHub issue: #2620 Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2620 Original created: 2026-01-30T18:28:17Z --- **Is your feature request related to a problem?** We should devise a way that plugins/plugin authors, leveraging the Go or Rust serviceradar plugin SDKs, can easily create `Device Records` in ServiceRadar. This would allow us to move our integration layer (armis, netbox, etc) to be just another WASM plugin and would make it easier for the community or users to develop integrations on their own. **Describe the solution you'd like** A clear and concise description of what you want to happen. **Describe alternatives you've considered** A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered. **Additional context** Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

mfreeman451 added the

enhancement

sdk

labels

2026-03-28 04:29:55 +00:00

mfreeman451 commented

2026-03-28 04:29:55 +00:00

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub comment.

Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2620#issuecomment-3825101381
Original created: 2026-01-30T18:35:11Z

Not sure if we could still use this for 2-way integrations, where we need to make an SRQL query to get some data and then push it to a 3rd party API. For Armis, we pull devices, and we also come back and update the Armis API, enriching an Armis device record by updating a tag (based on an ICMP/TCP availability check done by SR, we update a tag in Armis indicating if the device is available or not)

Imported GitHub comment. Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2620#issuecomment-3825101381 Original created: 2026-01-30T18:35:11Z --- Not sure if we could still use this for 2-way integrations, where we need to make an SRQL query to get some data and then push it to a 3rd party API. For Armis, we pull devices, and we also come back and update the Armis API, enriching an Armis device record by updating a tag (based on an ICMP/TCP availability check done by SR, we update a tag in Armis indicating if the device is available or not)

mfreeman451 commented

2026-03-28 04:29:55 +00:00

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub comment.

Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2620#issuecomment-3825142973
Original created: 2026-01-30T18:45:25Z

we could possibly make SRQL available via GRPC queries from agents, need to think more about security implications here/data leak potential/etc

Imported GitHub comment. Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2620#issuecomment-3825142973 Original created: 2026-01-30T18:45:25Z --- we could possibly make SRQL available via GRPC queries from agents, need to think more about security implications here/data leak potential/etc