chore: upgrade to bazel 9 #829
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar#829
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub.
Original GitHub issue: #2446
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2446
Original created: 2026-01-23T05:39:06Z
No description provided.
Imported GitHub comment.
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2446#issuecomment-3978736037
Original created: 2026-03-01T00:48:10Z
Started Bazel 9 migration on branch with the following baseline updates:
9.0.0in.bazelversionswiftlint,rules_foreign_cc,aspect_bazel_lib, plus direct-dep alignment from resolver warnings).bazelrc(--repo_contents_cache=) to avoid Bazel 9 repo-cache-in-workspace hard errorload()statements for removed native rules (sh_test,cc_library)Validation so far:
bazel query //...passes under Bazel 9bazel build //:gazellepasses under Bazel 9Next steps: run broader build/test targets in CI profile and fix any rule-level/runtime regressions discovered there.