chore(datasvc): deprecate datasvc #762

New issue

Open

opened 2026-03-28 04:28:16 +00:00 by mfreeman451 · 1 comment

mfreeman451 commented

2026-03-28 04:28:16 +00:00

Owner

Imported from GitHub.

Original GitHub issue: #2333
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2333
Original created: 2026-01-18T05:44:58Z

Is your feature request related to a problem?

We need to figure out what still depends on datasvc and see if we can remove it. Off the top of my head, I only think serviceradar-zen might still be using it after we finish #2332 and if it is, we can probably just bypass datasvc and talk to NATS JetStream/KV directly, maybe take some of the libraries / functions from datasvc and create a new library if we need to save ourselves some work, but I think we really just created this as a wrapper for other languages that were missing NATS libraries or they weren't very mature.

Describe the solution you'd like

A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered

A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Imported from GitHub. Original GitHub issue: #2333 Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2333 Original created: 2026-01-18T05:44:58Z --- **Is your feature request related to a problem?** We need to figure out what still depends on `datasvc` and see if we can remove it. Off the top of my head, I only think serviceradar-zen might still be using it after we finish #2332 and if it is, we can probably just bypass `datasvc` and talk to NATS JetStream/KV directly, maybe take some of the libraries / functions from datasvc and create a new library if we need to save ourselves some work, but I think we really just created this as a wrapper for other languages that were missing NATS libraries or they weren't very mature. **Describe the solution you'd like** A clear and concise description of what you want to happen. **Describe alternatives you've considered** A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered. **Additional context** Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

mfreeman451 commented

2026-03-28 04:28:17 +00:00

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub comment.

Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2333#issuecomment-3875556043
Original created: 2026-02-10T06:17:20Z

we could try to see if we could roll serviceradar-zen into elixir using rustler/NIF, could drop both services immediately and not have to worry about sync'ing KV rules anymore...

Imported GitHub comment. Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2333#issuecomment-3875556043 Original created: 2026-02-10T06:17:20Z --- we could try to see if we could roll serviceradar-zen into elixir using rustler/NIF, could drop both services immediately and not have to worry about sync'ing KV rules anymore...