feat: remove KV for config/dynamic config generation #761
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar#761
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub.
Original GitHub issue: #2332
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2332
Original created: 2026-01-18T05:40:15Z
Is your feature request related to a problem?
We are going to remove the ability to talk to/get config from the KV, on the edge collectors. There is really no need to be able to generate dynamic config for these services, nothing ever will change, and it just means we have to build more complicated config compilers in the core.
Eligible for cleanup:
We should be able to make a clean break in
pkg/configand completely remove all of the KV config code here and cleanup the affected services (rust and golang), we might also be able to get rid ofrust/kvutildont know if we need that anymore, and all of these services can just use json/yaml instead, and some of them will get their config over GRPC (serviceradar-agent). The elixir based services are all out of scope for this and none of them have been built around the KV config stuff anyways.Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.