feat: RBAC builder/editor #743
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar#743
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub.
Original GitHub issue: #2293
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2293
Original created: 2026-01-14T08:37:18Z
Is your feature request related to a problem?
We need a way to be able to create new RBAC profiles from the UI. This is something that only an admin or some kind of super_admin maybe (we would like to deprecate the concept of super_admin, but maybe it is worth keeping) could only build these things, the UI doesn't have to be super crazy but the main feature of this that we are looking for here is the ability to create groups of users and basically have an ACL that says what they can and cannot do on the system, beyond what we have today which is essentially
vieworadmin.Whatever we come up with has to be able to be evaluated fast, and it has to be idempotent -- live in the CNPG, loaded at startup, enforced at the API level (api lives in web-ng mostly anyways).
This thing doesn't really need to specifically be tenant aware since every tenant now gets their own schema in CNPG. We will also soon be moving to true tenant process isolation and every tenant will get their own core-elx and web-ng instance and whatever else.
Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.