feat: netflow collector (rust) and integration #699
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar#699
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub.
Original GitHub issue: #2181
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2181
Original created: 2025-12-18T05:40:18Z
Is your feature request related to a problem?
We need to integrate a netflow collector into ServiceRadar that can sit on the edge or in-cluster, receive netflow flow data, and write it to a message broker. The interface to the message broker should be abstracted so we could support additional / different message brokers in the future, right now we are currently targeting NATS JetStream but will be considering something like iggy.rs or some kind of hybrid architecture in the future. Once data is written to the message broker, we have several options of what to do next. Using the stateless rule-based zen-engine (serviceradar-zen), we can do really fast ETL to get it into the correct shape for an OCSF-based schema, write it to a different message subject, and then the
db-event-writerconsumer would process it off the queue and write it to the DB.Describe the solution you'd like
I think it makes more sense to try and do the ETL in our pipeline and not really in the rust netflow collector itself so that it stays generic or in whatever existing format it's already in and we can keep using the upstream version.
https://schema.ocsf.io/1.7.0/classes/network_activity
Future work would be around analysis/data processing and could involve @marvin-hansen and his causal computation library (https://github.com/deepcausality-rs)
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Related to https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/611
Imported GitHub comment.
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/2181#issuecomment-3978681918
Original created: 2026-03-01T00:14:06Z
closing, completed