review(monitoring.proto): use google.protobuf.Timestamp instead of int64 #67

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-28 04:20:56 +00:00 by mfreeman451 · 1 comment

mfreeman451 commented

2026-03-28 04:20:56 +00:00

Owner

Imported from GitHub.

Original GitHub issue: #159
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/159
Original created: 2025-01-31T07:52:47Z

Consider using google.protobuf.Timestamp for timestamps instead of int64 to provide more semantic meaning. This would require updating how timestamps are handled in the Go code.

Imported from GitHub. Original GitHub issue: #159 Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/159 Original created: 2025-01-31T07:52:47Z --- Consider using google.protobuf.Timestamp for timestamps instead of int64 to provide more semantic meaning. This would require updating how timestamps are handled in the Go code.

mfreeman451 commented

2026-03-28 04:20:56 +00:00

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub comment.

Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/159#issuecomment-3813972631
Original created: 2026-01-28T21:15:34Z

closing, stale

Imported GitHub comment. Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/159#issuecomment-3813972631 Original created: 2026-01-28T21:15:34Z --- closing, stale