feat: support for multiple cores/clustering #582

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-28 04:26:00 +00:00 by mfreeman451 · 2 comments

mfreeman451 commented

2026-03-28 04:26:00 +00:00

Owner

Imported from GitHub.

Original GitHub issue: #1815
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/1815
Original created: 2025-10-20T14:42:39Z

Is your feature request related to a problem?

We should be able to support an HA configuration for serviceradar cores, it seems that this would also require users to upgrade from timeplus-proton to timeplus-enterprise.

Describe the solution you'd like

A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered

A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Imported from GitHub. Original GitHub issue: #1815 Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/1815 Original created: 2025-10-20T14:42:39Z --- **Is your feature request related to a problem?** We should be able to support an HA configuration for serviceradar cores, it seems that this would also require users to upgrade from timeplus-proton to timeplus-enterprise. **Describe the solution you'd like** A clear and concise description of what you want to happen. **Describe alternatives you've considered** A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered. **Additional context** Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

mfreeman451 commented

2026-03-28 04:26:00 +00:00

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub comment.

Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/1815#issuecomment-3422390243
Original created: 2025-10-20T14:44:44Z

We could possibly workaround the timeplus-enterprise requirement by pushing data into CH and then querying CH directly from the core/API. We would lose the ability to do streaming requests from the DB, which may mean we only break the log streaming at this point.

Need to do more investigation

Imported GitHub comment. Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/1815#issuecomment-3422390243 Original created: 2025-10-20T14:44:44Z --- We could possibly workaround the timeplus-enterprise requirement by pushing data into CH and then querying CH directly from the core/API. We would lose the ability to do streaming requests from the DB, which may mean we only break the log streaming at this point. Need to do more investigation

mfreeman451 commented

2026-03-28 04:26:00 +00:00

Author

Owner

Imported GitHub comment.

Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/1815#issuecomment-3813922422
Original created: 2026-01-28T21:03:42Z

closing, stale

Imported GitHub comment. Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/issues/1815#issuecomment-3813922422 Original created: 2026-01-28T21:03:42Z --- closing, stale