fix: adding defensive checks #3090
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!3090
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/3090/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub pull request.
Original GitHub pull request: #3092
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/3092
Original created: 2026-03-27T20:15:09Z
Original updated: 2026-03-27T20:19:38Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:3085-bugagent-gateway-mtr----too-many-concurrent-mtr-traces
Original base: staging
Original merged: 2026-03-27T20:15:45Z by @mfreeman451
IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin
Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:
Describe your changes
Issue ticket number and link
Code checklist before requesting a review
Imported GitHub PR review comment.
Original author: @Copilot
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/3092#discussion_r3003019723
Original created: 2026-03-27T20:19:37Z
Original path: elixir/serviceradar_core/lib/serviceradar/edge/agent_command_bus.ex
Original line: 270
ensure_dispatch_capacity/3runs a separate read beforecreate_command/2, so concurrent dispatches can race (both see <2 active commands) and still create more than@max_concurrent_on_demand_mtr. If the goal is to enforce the limit reliably, this needs an atomic guard (e.g., DB transaction + per-agent lock/advisory lock, or a dedicated counter row updated withSELECT ... FOR UPDATE, or another serialization mechanism) around the check+create.Imported GitHub PR review comment.
Original author: @Copilot
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/3092#discussion_r3003019744
Original created: 2026-03-27T20:19:37Z
Original path: elixir/web-ng/lib/serviceradar_web_ng_web/live/diagnostics_live/mtr.ex
Original line: 217
handle_info/2now callsschedule_refresh/1for every{:command_result, %{command_type: "mtr.run"}}received on the global "agent:commands" topic. Since these events are broadcast to all subscribers, this can trigger periodic DB refreshes for all connected MTR diagnostics sessions even when the result is unrelated to the current view’s active command; there’s already a separate:mtr_trace_ingestedsubscription that refreshes when a trace is written. Consider keeping the refresh conditional (e.g., only when it matches:mtr_command_id) or scoping the PubSub topic/events so unrelated MTR results don’t cause refresh work.