OCSF device inventory schema alignment #2601
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!2601
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/2601/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub pull request.
Original GitHub pull request: #2186
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2186
Original created: 2025-12-18T08:08:50Z
Original updated: 2025-12-19T04:34:13Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:2177-feat-ocsf-device-inventory-schema-alignment
Original base: staging
Original merged: 2025-12-19T04:34:12Z by @mfreeman451
IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin
Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:
Describe your changes
Issue ticket number and link
Code checklist before requesting a review
Imported GitHub PR review comment.
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2186#discussion_r2631775826
Original created: 2025-12-18T16:33:43Z
Original path: pkg/db/cnpg_unified_devices.go
Original line: 35
need to get rid of these maps
Imported GitHub PR review comment.
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2186#discussion_r2632059694
Original created: 2025-12-18T18:06:10Z
Original path: pkg/registry/canon_simulation_test.go
Original line: 334
dont understand why this returns empty still?
Imported GitHub PR review comment.
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2186#discussion_r2632062669
Original created: 2025-12-18T18:07:22Z
Original path: rust/srql/src/models.rs
Original line: 68
need to get rid of the aliases
Imported GitHub PR review comment.
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2186#discussion_r2632066156
Original created: 2025-12-18T18:08:32Z
Original path: rust/srql/tests/fixtures/schema.sql
Original line: 44
not sure that we want serviceradar specific fields here, we break the schema.. cant we put these somewhere else?
Imported GitHub PR review comment.
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2186#discussion_r2632069952
Original created: 2025-12-18T18:09:42Z
Original path: web-ng/lib/serviceradar_web_ng/api/device_controller.ex
Original line: 257
need to get rid of the aliases here and make sure we're not relying on them anywhere else