Release/1 0 66 r1 #2538
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!2538
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/2538/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub pull request.
Original GitHub pull request: #2097
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2097
Original created: 2025-12-10T16:17:58Z
Original updated: 2025-12-10T16:29:22Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:release/1_0_66-r1
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-12-10T16:29:18Z by @mfreeman451
User description
IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin
Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:
Describe your changes
Issue ticket number and link
Code checklist before requesting a review
PR Type
Other
Description
Release version 1.0.66 with Rust edge improvements
Enhanced mTLS bootstrap and configuration handling
Added Bazel RBE platform configuration for RHEL 9
Added Podman deployment documentation support
Fixed deadlock issues and updated build configurations
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
CHANGELOG
Added v1.0.66 release notes and changelogCHANGELOG
VERSION
Bump version to 1.0.66VERSION
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2097#issuecomment-3637885898
Original created: 2025-12-10T16:18:26Z
PR Compliance Guide 🔍
Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
No security concerns identified
No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.🎫 No ticket provided
Codebase context is not defined
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails
Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.
Status:
No runtime code: The PR only updates documentation and versioning with no new executable code to assess for
audit trail logging of critical actions.
Referred Code
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting
Status:
No identifiers added: Only CHANGELOG text and VERSION were modified; no new identifiers or code were introduced
to evaluate naming.
Referred Code
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation
Status:
No error paths: The diff contains no executable code or error handling changes to assess robustness or
edge case management.
Referred Code
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status:
No user errors: Only documentation/version updates were added; there are no user-facing error messages to
review for sensitive detail leakage.
Referred Code
Generic: Secure Logging Practices
Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.
Status:
No logging code: The PR does not introduce logging statements; only changelog and version updates were
made, so secure logging cannot be assessed.
Referred Code
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities
Status:
No input handling: There are no new input or data handling changes in the diff to evaluate validation,
sanitization, or authorization.
Referred Code
Compliance status legend
🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2097#issuecomment-3637887391
Original created: 2025-12-10T16:18:48Z
PR Code Suggestions ✨
No code suggestions found for the PR.