adding podman section #2532
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!2532
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/2532/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub pull request.
Original GitHub pull request: #2091
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2091
Original created: 2025-12-08T22:20:20Z
Original updated: 2025-12-08T22:21:35Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:chore/podman_updates
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-12-08T22:20:27Z by @mfreeman451
User description
IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin
Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:
Describe your changes
Issue ticket number and link
Code checklist before requesting a review
PR Type
Documentation, Enhancement
Description
Added comprehensive Podman setup guide as Docker alternative
Updated prerequisites to mention Podman 4.0+ compatibility
Included distribution-specific installation instructions
Documented rootful mode requirement and SELinux considerations
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
README-Docker.md
Add Podman setup documentation and compatibility notesREADME-Docker.md
alternative
setup guide
AlmaLinux/RHEL/Rocky and Ubuntu/Debian
containers and low port bindings
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2091#issuecomment-3629245684
Original created: 2025-12-08T22:20:42Z
PR Compliance Guide 🔍
Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
Privileged container usage
Description: The documentation instructs running Podman Compose with sudo/root (rootful mode) and
privileged containers, which encourages operating the stack with full root privileges and
could increase risk of host compromise if images or configurations are malicious or
compromised.
README-Docker.md [68-76]
Referred Code
Ubuntu / Debian:
Running ServiceRadar with Podman:
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting
Status:
Not Applicable: Only Markdown documentation changes were introduced without code identifiers to evaluate
for naming conventions.
Referred Code
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation
Status:
No Runtime Code: The diff contains shell command examples in documentation but no application code paths
where error handling and edge cases can be assessed.
Referred Code
Ubuntu / Debian:
Running ServiceRadar with Podman:
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status:
Docs Only: No user-facing application error messages were added or modified; the PR only updates
documentation, so secure error handling cannot be evaluated.
Referred Code
Ubuntu / Debian:
Running ServiceRadar with Podman:
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities
Status:
Operational Guidance: The added content provides operational setup instructions (Podman rootful mode, privileged
containers) without application input handling changes, so security validation cannot be
assessed from this diff.
Referred Code
Compliance status legend
🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2091#issuecomment-3629248153
Original created: 2025-12-08T22:21:35Z
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
Provide robust Podman installation instructions
Update the Podman installation instructions for Ubuntu/Debian to ensure a
compatible version is installed and to avoid pulling in unwanted Docker
dependencies.
README-Docker.md [60-64]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4
__
Why: This suggestion correctly points out an inconsistency in the documentation, which could confuse users. Adding the corresponding
podman compose logscommand improves the clarity and completeness of the instructions.