cleanup #2522
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!2522
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/2522/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub pull request.
Original GitHub pull request: #2078
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2078
Original created: 2025-12-08T04:36:55Z
Original updated: 2025-12-08T04:48:11Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:chore/eslintrc-upgrade
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-12-08T04:48:08Z by @mfreeman451
User description
IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin
Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:
Describe your changes
Issue ticket number and link
Code checklist before requesting a review
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
Remove unused
@eslint/eslintrcdependency from projectClean up package.json and lock file entries
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
package.json
Remove @eslint/eslintrc devDependencyweb/package.json
@eslint/eslintrcfrom devDependenciespnpm-lock.yaml
Remove @eslint/eslintrc lock entryweb/pnpm-lock.yaml
@eslint/eslintrcversion 3.3.1 entryImported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2078#issuecomment-3624693393
Original created: 2025-12-08T04:37:16Z
PR Compliance Guide 🔍
Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
No security concerns identified
No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.🎫 No ticket provided
Codebase context is not defined
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails
Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.
Status:
No audit scope: The PR only updates dependencies and lockfile without adding or modifying runtime code, so
it neither demonstrates nor violates audit logging requirements within the shown diff.
Referred Code
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting
Status:
No identifiers added: The diff contains only dependency list changes and adds no new identifiers or code to
assess for naming clarity.
Referred Code
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation
Status:
No error paths: The PR modifies dependency metadata only and introduces no executable code where error
handling could be evaluated.
Referred Code
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status:
No user errors: There are no user-facing error messages or error handling changes in the dependency
cleanup diff to assess for secure messaging.
Referred Code
Generic: Secure Logging Practices
Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.
Status:
No logging changes: The changes only remove a devDependency and its lock entries, adding no logging statements
to evaluate for sensitivity or structure.
Referred Code
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities
Status:
No input handling: No new input processing or security-relevant code was added in this PR; only dependency
entries were modified.
Referred Code
Compliance status legend
🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2078#issuecomment-3624693863
Original created: 2025-12-08T04:37:31Z
PR Code Suggestions ✨
No code suggestions found for the PR.