bump #2521
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!2521
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "refs/pull/2521/head"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Imported from GitHub pull request.
Original GitHub pull request: #2077
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2077
Original created: 2025-12-08T04:24:22Z
Original updated: 2025-12-08T04:28:28Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:chore/bump_brace_expansion
Original base: main
Original merged: 2025-12-08T04:28:25Z by @mfreeman451
User description
IMPORTANT: Please sign the Developer Certificate of Origin
Thank you for your contribution to ServiceRadar. Please note, when contributing, the developer must include
a DCO sign-off statement indicating the DCO acceptance in one commit message. Here
is an example DCO Signed-off-by line in a commit message:
Describe your changes
Issue ticket number and link
Code checklist before requesting a review
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
Add brace-expansion security override to pnpm configuration
Enforce minimum version 1.1.12 for brace-expansion dependency
Update lock file with new brace-expansion version
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
package.json
Add pnpm override for brace-expansion securityweb/package.json
pnpm.overridessection to enforce brace-expansion minimumversion 1.1.12
pnpm-lock.yaml
Update brace-expansion to 1.1.12 in lock fileweb/pnpm-lock.yaml
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2077#issuecomment-3624662433
Original created: 2025-12-08T04:24:42Z
PR Compliance Guide 🔍
Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
No security concerns identified
No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.🎫 No ticket provided
Codebase context is not defined
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting
Status: Passed
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status: Passed
Generic: Secure Logging Practices
Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.
Status: Passed
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities
Status: Passed
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails
Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.
Status:
No runtime code: The PR only updates package manager overrides and lockfile without adding or modifying
application logic that could include audit logging of critical actions.
Referred Code
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation
Status:
No error paths: Changes are limited to dependency overrides and lockfile updates and do not introduce code
paths where error handling or edge case logic would apply.
Referred Code
Compliance status legend
🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label
Imported GitHub PR comment.
Original author: @qodo-code-review[bot]
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/2077#issuecomment-3624666208
Original created: 2025-12-08T04:25:36Z
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
Consolidate overrides into the standard field
Consolidate the
pnpm.overridesinto the standard root-leveloverridesfield toimprove standardization and maintainability, as
pnpmnow supports this feature.web/package.json [49-63]
[To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually]Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
__
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that
pnpm.overridesis a legacy field and proposes using the standard root-leveloverridesfield, which improves code standardization and maintainability.