carverauto/serviceradar
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 190 Pull requests 16 Projects Releases 173 Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Allow configurable sweep interval #1796

Merged
mfreeman451 merged 1 commit from refs/pull/1796/head into 1024-featsync-poller-interval-should-be-configurable 2025-06-21 03:35:41 +00:00
Conversation 0 Commits 1 Files changed 6 +28 -8
mfreeman451 commented 2025-06-21 03:34:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Owner
Copy link

Imported from GitHub pull request.

Original GitHub pull request: #1028
Original author: @mfreeman451
Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1028
Original created: 2025-06-21T03:34:31Z
Original updated: 2025-06-21T03:35:59Z
Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:codex/make-sweep-interval-configurable-in-sync.json
Original base: 1024-featsync-poller-interval-should-be-configurable
Original merged: 2025-06-21T03:35:41Z by @mfreeman451

Summary

  • make sweep interval configurable per integration via sweep_interval
  • use the new interval when constructing Armis and Netbox sweep configs
  • document the new setting and show examples
  • update sample sync.json configuration

Testing

  • go test ./...

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_685625b5653c8320996da55be51a763c

Imported from GitHub pull request. Original GitHub pull request: #1028 Original author: @mfreeman451 Original URL: https://github.com/carverauto/serviceradar/pull/1028 Original created: 2025-06-21T03:34:31Z Original updated: 2025-06-21T03:35:59Z Original head: carverauto/serviceradar:codex/make-sweep-interval-configurable-in-sync.json Original base: 1024-featsync-poller-interval-should-be-configurable Original merged: 2025-06-21T03:35:41Z by @mfreeman451 --- ## Summary - make sweep interval configurable per integration via `sweep_interval` - use the new interval when constructing Armis and Netbox sweep configs - document the new setting and show examples - update sample sync.json configuration ## Testing - `go test ./...` ------ https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_685625b5653c8320996da55be51a763c
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels   
1week

   
2weeks

   
Failed compliance check

   
IP cameras

   
NATS

NATS JetStream

  
Possible security concern

   
Review effort 1/5

   
Review effort 2/5

   
Review effort 3/5

   
Review effort 4/5

   
Review effort 5/5

   
UI

   
aardvark

   
accessibility

   
amd64

   
api

   
arm64

   
auth

   
back-end

   
bgp

   
blog

   
bug

Something isn't working

  
build

   
checkers

   
ci-cd

continuous integration-continuous deployments

  
cleanup

   
cnpg

cloud-native postgres

  
codex

   
core

core service

  
dependencies

Pull requests that update a dependency file

  
device-management

   
documentation

Improvements or additions to documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
dusk

   
ebpf

   
enhancement

New feature or request

  
eta 1d

   
eta 1hr

   
eta 3d

   
eta 3hr

   
feature

   
fieldsurvey

   
github_actions

Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code

  
go

Pull requests that update Go code

  
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
help wanted

Extra attention is needed

  
invalid

This doesn't seem right

  
javascript

Pull requests that update Javascript code

  
k8s

   
log-collector

   
mapper

   
mtr

multi traceroute

  
needs-triage

   
netflow

   
network-sweep

   
observability

   
oracle

Oracle Linux related issues

  
otel

opentelemetry logs, traces, metrics

  
plug-in

   
proton

timeplus proton streaming database

  
python

   
question

Further information is requested

  
reddit

   
redhat

   
research

   
rperf

   
rperf-checker

   
rust

Pull requests that update rust code

  
sdk

   
security

   
serviceradar-agent

   
serviceradar-agent-gateway

   
serviceradar-web

   
serviceradar-web-ng

   
siem

   
snmp

   
sysmon

   
topology

   
ubiquiti

   
wasm

   
wontfix

This will not be worked on

  
zen-engine
No labels
1week
2weeks
Failed compliance check
IP cameras
NATS
Possible security concern
Review effort 1/5
Review effort 2/5
Review effort 3/5
Review effort 4/5
Review effort 5/5
UI
aardvark
accessibility
amd64
api
arm64
auth
back-end
bgp
blog
bug
build
checkers
ci-cd
cleanup
cnpg
codex
core
dependencies
device-management
documentation
duplicate
dusk
ebpf
enhancement
eta 1d
eta 1hr
eta 3d
eta 3hr
feature
fieldsurvey
github_actions
go
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
k8s
log-collector
mapper
mtr
needs-triage
netflow
network-sweep
observability
oracle
otel
plug-in
proton
python
question
reddit
redhat
research
rperf
rperf-checker
rust
sdk
security
serviceradar-agent
serviceradar-agent-gateway
serviceradar-web
serviceradar-web-ng
siem
snmp
sysmon
topology
ubiquiti
wasm
wontfix
zen-engine
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
carverauto/serviceradar!1796
No description provided.